Evaluations

/Evaluations
Courses
Excel for Public Safety (1271)PowerPoint for Public Safety (714)Cell Phone Investigations (700)Cell Phone Data and Mapping (555)Dark Web Investigations (469)Online Investigations (469)Open Source Investigations (449)Analytics for Public Safety (390)Social Media Methods (287)Effective Writing for Law Enforcement (277)PIO and Community Engagement (178)Exploiting Technology in Real Time Investigations (159)Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement (140)OIS Investigations (128)OneNote: Digital Case Management (110)Securing Your Identity (89)Analytic Unit Supervisor (79)Find Anyone Online (68)Cryptocurrency Investigations (60)Human Trafficking Investigations (46)Internet of Things (IoT) Investigations (37)Confidential Informants (29)Excel: Data and Mapping (29)Passenger Vehicle Drug Interdiction (22)Operational Red Flags (18)Fentanyl Investigations (14)Patrol Officer Response to Street Drugs (13)Real Time Crime Centers (RTCC) for Public Safety (13)Narcotics Investigations (10)Excel: Advanced Topics (8)Dialogue on Race and Law Enforcement (7)Slavery's Legacy for Law Enforcement (4)

Evaluations For: Analytic Unit Supervisor

Instructor: Mike Berndl
Location: Chandler, AZ
Dates: March 21, 2016 - March 22, 2016

Follow Up Questions

64% would recommend this course/instructor to others in their agency.

82% would recommend this training provider to others in their agency.

82% will be able to use what they learned in this course.

Individual Evaluations

Previous
Next

Evaluation 1

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Excellent class, should be a week long class

Evaluation 2

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)4
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location4
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)2
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)3
Credibility (Education, Experience)4
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)4
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)3
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)4
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?no
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Information was too generic. I was looking more for specific best practices and examples of issues Crime Analyst Supervisors deal with day to day.

Evaluation 3

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Very well presented.

Evaluation 4

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Michael did an excellent job.

Evaluation 5

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)4
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
.

Evaluation 6

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)4
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
None

Evaluation 7

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)3
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)3
Quality of the Training Location3
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)3
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)3
Credibility (Education, Experience)3
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)3
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)3
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)3
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?no
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?no
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
just seemed like this was maybe the first time he had taught this class and didn't really believe in it

Evaluation 8

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)3
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)3
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)3
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)2
Credibility (Education, Experience)2
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)2
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)2
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)2
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?no
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?no
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?no
Instructor asked for student interaction but then was not really interested in the students' responses. The instructor didn't seem to have a good idea of the analysts' actual job functions. The instructor did not seem genuine. He was scattered and gave poor instruction on how to complete the assignments. I would not take another class from him.

Evaluation 9

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)3
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)3
Quality of the Training Location4
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)2
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)2
Credibility (Education, Experience)3
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)2
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)2
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)3
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?no
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?no
.

Evaluation 10

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)4
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)4
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)4
Credibility (Education, Experience)4
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)4
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)4
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)4
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
I wish there was less focus on the elevator pitch. Also more focus on intelligence vs crime analysis.

Evaluation 11

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
None